The theory of forms is Plato's claim that the world encountered by the senses depends on a realm of perfect, unchanging patterns. A circle drawn on paper is imperfect and will decay; the circle itself is neither.

The argument from imperfection

Nothing in experience is exactly equal to anything else, yet we understand equality and can judge how far particulars fall short. Plato argued in the Phaedo that the standard cannot be drawn from the instances, since the instances are being measured against it. The form is that standard, grasped by thought rather than by sight.

Forms are eternal, unchanging, and exist independently of the things that participate in them. This makes knowledge possible: there is something stable to know, where the sensible world offers only opinion about what is constantly becoming otherwise.

The cave

The allegory of the cave in Republic VII (c. 375 BC) dramatizes the position. Prisoners watch shadows and take them for reality. One is freed, turns toward the fire and then the sun, and returns to find the others hostile to his report. The ascent is education and the sun is the form of the good, which makes the other forms intelligible.

The objections

Plato raised the strongest objection himself in the Parmenides. If a large thing is large by resembling largeness, a further form seems needed to explain the resemblance between them, and so on without end — the third man argument.

Aristotle rejected the separation. Forms are real and exist in the particulars that have them, not in a realm apart, which is why his substance combines matter and form. The dispute became the problem of universals and ran through medieval philosophy into the present.