Herbert Simon (1916–2001) argued that human rationality is limited by information, time and mental capacity, and built a body of work across economics, psychology and artificial intelligence on that premise. He won the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1978 and the Turing Award in 1975.

Bounded rationality

Economic models assumed decision-makers with complete information and unlimited capacity to compute. Simon argued in Administrative Behavior (1947) that real decisions are made by people who have partial information, limited attention and a deadline.

The consequence is not slightly worse optimization but a different procedure. People satisfice: they set a threshold for what counts as good enough and take the first option meeting it. Searching for the best option requires comparing all of them, which is usually impossible and always expensive. Satisficing is the rational response to the cost of search, which is why it is a description of intelligence rather than a failure of it.

Attention

Simon observed in 1971 that a wealth of information creates a poverty of attention. When information is scarce, the constraint is getting it; when information is abundant, the constraint is deciding what to ignore. The observation anticipated most of what is now said about focus and is the sharpest available statement of why proxy work accumulates.

Organizations and AI

He treated organizations as devices for decomposing decisions that no individual could make alone, with hierarchy functioning as a structure for allocating attention.

With Allen Newell he built some of the first programs to solve problems by search through a space of possibilities rather than by algorithm, including the Logic Theorist in 1956. That work founded symbolic artificial intelligence and shares its premise with the economics: intelligence is search under constraint.